Towards More Balanced Treatment Of Culture -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Towards More Balanced Treatment Of Culture? Answer: Introducation In the 21st century, the global market place has become highly integrated and it is extremely important that the various business organizations tend to communicate clearly in order to make sure that all the deals are clearly laid out. The importance of multi cultures cannot be underestimated in today`s market place (Prasad, 2015). The various multi-cultural expectations need to be managed effectively in order to have a balanced environment. Given below are certain issues that lead to a business concern: If the owners of the business are not pro-active, this might lead to different cultural expectations and get the deal started on a wrong note. Formality, hierarchy and timings have different relevance to different cultures and these should be kept in mind before taking into consideration a negotiation or a business decision Very often, certain cultures may appear to be quite aggressive in their approach. Certain deals tend to take more time than the other countries and therefore, adequate care must be taken about these factors before engaging in a business relationship. There is a variety of cultures that are generally, `we` focused. This tends to have an impact on business style and marketing material. Therefore, it is extremely important to make sure that the egocentric component of `i` is identified or `we` oriented (Kinloch Metge, 2014). Body language also tends to play an important role in business transactions. Therefore, a basic guideline is to use openhanded gestures. Hence, it can be states that as globalization have open the trade boundaries of all regions, various business houses from different countries tend to interact with one another and culture tends to play a major role in their interactions. The above issues might come in between while these business communication activities and this is the reason cross-cultural communication is often considered to be a business issue. When two different businesses come together for a business deal, it becomes extremely important that the cultures of the different countries blend with one another. Business ethics states that two countries that are in business relationship with one another need to be considerate towards one another and understand their needs (Carbaugh, 2013). There should be equal amount of respect and appreciation from both the sides, which will lead to a peaceful transaction. However, this is not the case in case of a cross-cultural communication in business. When a cross-cultural communication takes place the two parties in center do not have a clear understanding of the requirements of one another and this may lead to actions that may harm the greater good of one party at the hands of the other party. Hence, it is extremely important that the parties in a business concern understand the do`s and donts of one another. The cross-cultural communication becomes an ethical concern because it affects the day-to-day working relationships, it determines the appropriate code of conduct and it plays a key role in the power and status distribution allocation of the two countries (Bochner, 2013). Understanding of ethics in a business by a professional may help in the following manner: It may help the executives to understand the do`s and donts in the other culture It may help in proper distribution of power and conduct It may also help the associates to reflect proper behaviour while transacting (Asante, 2013). It may help in a long lasting deal with the various associates. The ability to communicate effectively may prove to be a challenge in today`s market place. Even when the parties are aware of one anothers language. These mistakes in understanding might arise from ethical and cultural differences. There are numerous business example which have stated that the various poor communication among the parties tend to a failed deal. It also leads to poor communication which results in incorrect organizational management (Shebzukhova Bondarenko, 2014). Hence, it is considered important for an organization to understand the impact of cross-cultural o the business sector and this understanding will help the firm to create a competitive advantage and foster an environment where all cultures can come together and conduct their business. Recent economic challenges as in the increasing desire to expand this business have increased the need to develop an internal communication, which is necessary to control, and monitor the various threats. The society has lately become connected globally and this will also increase its ability to conduct business. These economic challenges have also made it important for the business to recruit a large number of employees from various cultural backgrounds. Hence, the business must understand how to communicate with them (Hurn Tomalin, 2013).. Therefore, as the economic era today requires sales and revenue from round the globe with the growth of various MNCs, the author has suggested that the Recent Economic challenges require the organization to develop a proper internal monitoring system so that the various external threats are analyzed. These threats may refer to economic conditions like recession, exchange rate fluctuation, change of political systems, events like Brexit, launch of new budgets and so on. As the business has been expanding considerably into beyond the countries of origin, it becomes increasingly important for the various business enterprises to make an effort and try to understand certain aspects of the other culture in order to make sure that they can easily cater to their needs (Young Schartner, 2014). However, proficiency in the cultural aspect necessarily does not mean that the business owners need to know everything about the culture. Their main requirement is that they need to be inquisitive and possess a thrust for knowledge. The business entrepreneurs must be able to able to have the habit of understanding when to listen and when to ask for help. A person is not expected to have the knowledge of every kind of cultural. He is just expected to be considerate towards it and be empathic. The business entrepreneur must be able to understand that in different cultures, things take place in a different manner and that it is extremely important to abide by the laws o f every cultural (Leung, Ang Tan, 2014). He must be able to listen and keep a check for the various hints suggested by the other forces, understand the need of the hour and speak up accordingly (Merkin, Taras Steel, 2014). When the person communicates to the other cultural party, they should make sure that they do not hurt any sentiments and communicate effectively. As the organizations have been expanding their scope of operation, it becomes extremely important or the business organization to have a vast pool of employees who are talented and belong to different backgrounds. This tends to increase and promote diversity management in the organization, which is the need of the hour. However, the components of a culture may differ from one another and they are hard to cope by (Padhi, 2016). A culture cannot be changed because it is the experience of several of years, which have been passed down. People belonging to a particular culture generally tend to have lower perceptions of the management from another culture. This aspect is difficult to change as suggested in the paper of reference and if the workers are forced to behave like one another, it diffuses creativity. Hence, for this reason it is extremely important to understand that the focus needs to lie on individual training. The focus on the individual should not be emphasized to change the cultural aspect of the person but to increase the person`s innovation skills. This innovation will reflect the cultural background of the person thereby making the production extremely diverse. Individual training needs to be given to the employees so that their communication skills can improve and this shall lead to fulfillment of the basic goals of an organization. Through this training, the employees will possess the ability to communicate clearly with one another and thereby infuse creativity into the organization (Chaney Martin, 2013). The advantage and knowledge of different cultures should be combined to prosper the growth of the firm Communication can be taken to be the key to success for any business organization. It is a critical aspect of any business company and it helps the organization to make the consumers understand and provide more information about their products and services. This shall help the enterprise in gaining a competitive advantage. It is often stated that those companies, which are able to communicate cross-culturally, are more successful and have a greater competitive advantage. This is because these companies have better communication within the organization and are able to devote more time and resources to conducting the actual operations of business and less time on solving the various external as well as internal communication problems (Law, Buhalis Cobanoglu, 2014). Communication helps the individual to communicate clearly and fulfill their needs. When these needs are fulfilled within the organization, various cultures tend to prosper. Business houses tend to adopt the different working styles, which as stated previously foster creativity and helps the organization to gain an edge (Jandt, 2017).Since various organizations tend to establish themselves in different regions, a cross-culturally diverse force will help in expansion. Hence, this communication shall help the firm to become a powerful company and perform better than their competitors. The home country is India. In India, the people have a passive communication style. The people do not have an open approach towards life and this tends to reflect in their business where the deals, which are made, are not that clear and this tends to dominate the business culture. Hindi is the official language (Fletcher Crawford, 2013). The Indians are quite diplomatic and do not believe in directness. They are hypocrites and may appear confused (Samovar et al., 2014). The Indians like to brag and adopt a self-promotional approach. Humor is considered to be offensive in business dealings. Word of mouth plays a huge role in business transactions. When comparing this to Australia, people in Australia have n open or active communication style. They tend to have an open approach towards life and this tends to reflect in their style of business. They are proactive and have an instant reply to all problems. English is the official and most spoke language. They are not diplomatic and tend to put directness before diplomacy. Very often, this aspect is taken to be as blunt in certain situations especially if taken from the point of view of country like India (Stahl Tung, 2015). However, in their own country, directness and instant replies are cherished and hence the failure to speak one`s mind may appear as hypocrisy or evasiveness. The Australians do not prefer bragging and for this reason, a self-promotional approach may be misunderstood in Australia thereby provoking a negative response. Australia is one of those cultures in which humor is considered to be pervasive (Richter et al., 2013). It is also acceptable in all kinds of situations and is even expected. The business people in Australia have a role of using first names for business references. As discussed earlier one of the differences that could be identified from the above is the self-bragging approach. The Australians have a subtle way of dealing with the various problems whereas the Indians have a bragging manner. The Australians do not believe in self-promotion but the Indians do. The Indians believe that by stating themselves as the best they might be able to attract a larger crowd. By attracting a larger crowd, they will be able to make more business. However, this is not the case for Australia (Eisenberg et al., 2013). The Australians believe that self-promotion or self-bragging is unethical and that actions speak louder than words, hence they dot believe in diplomacy also. This could lead to problems in business as in if an Australian company and an Indian company come into contact with one another then both the cultures shall crash as the Australians might not like the approach of the Indians towards the business and this might lead to mistrust and conflicts. When a business firm has a diverse management system then they will tend to become accustomed to the different working styles. The business must understand that cross-cultural differences might occur in the firms operations and this understanding will help the company to manage the people in a better manner when dealing with customers with a different cultural background (Ferraro Briody, 2017). The communication system of a firm comprises of values, rules ad practices and the thinking of the senior management. This system may enact as a chain in transmitting these norms associated with different countries throughout the culture. This communication system, which is acting as a transmitter, may act as a knowledge transmitter also. Intercultural communication, which takes place in a business enterprise, needs to consider the differences that are present in the organization. This tends to become a huge challenge for them to develop a synthesis between various workers in order to promote diversity. This is where the organizations tend to make huge mistakes (Adekola Sergi, 2016). They have a habit of overemphasizes the differences between these employees and tend to stereotype them to a particular type (Dunning, 2014). These stereo types may result in promotions being conceived and this tends to become a communication hindrance. Very often cultures are classified as high context and low context. High context is where the society is considered to be inter-dependent. The meanings attached to a single word may lead to various meanings. The body language also needs to be taken care of before approaching people from diverse cultures. A stereotype that the Australians may have about the Indians is that the Indians are very close-minded people. This thinking may derive from their thinking or from the way, they carry themselves. Indians tend to keep their ideas amongst themselves and this may lead to problems in perception of the Australia. The Australians may believe that the Indians do not believe in the modern society and that they are extremely regressive in their thinking. They may stereotype the Indians as against new ideas (Zhu Bargiela-Chiappini, 2013). However, it is not so the Indians though are not that opinionated, have progressive thinking. Just because of the presentation of a few the completely Indian society might be perceived as regressive but as stated it is not so. They are quite broad minded and tend to accept new ideas and concepts with an open mind. The Indians have contributed greatly too many new ideas and inventions. On the other hand, the Indians may perceive the Australians ass extremely open-minded and therefore believe that they do not have values or culture of their own. The Indians often believe that their culture is the best and that other cultures have no importance. They think that since Australians possess a progressive mind, they lack in values and cultures. However, this is not the case; the Australians have huge and deep cultures that date back to centuries (Czinkota Ronkainen, 2013). They have high family as well as business values which tend to have an impact on their decision making and code of conducts in a business. References Adekola, A., Sergi, B. S. (2016).Global business management: A cross-cultural perspective. Routledge. Asante, M. K. (2013).The global intercultural communication reader. Routledge. Bochner, S. (Ed.). (2013).Cultures in contact: Studies in cross-cultural interaction(Vol. 1). Elsevier. Carbaugh, D. (2013).Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Routledge. Chaney, L., Martin, J. (2013).Intercultural business communication. Pearson Higher Ed. Czinkota, M. R., Ronkainen, I. A. (2013).International marketing. Cengage Learning. Dunning, J. H. (2014).The Globalization of Business (Routledge Revivals): The Challenge of the 1990s. Routledge. Eisenberg, J., Lee, H. J., Brck, F., Brenner, B., Claes, M. T., Mironski, J., Bell, R. (2013). Can business schools make students culturally competent? Effects of cross-cultural management courses on cultural intelligence.Academy of Management Learning Education,12(4), 603-621. Ferraro, G. P., Briody, E. K. (2017).The cultural dimension of global business. Taylor Francis. Fletcher, R., Crawford, H. (2013).International marketing: an Asia-Pacific perspective. Pearson Higher Education AU. Hurn, B., Tomalin, B. (2013).Cross-cultural communication: Theory and practice. Springer. Jandt, F. E. (2017).An introduction to intercultural communication: Identities in a global community. Sage Publications. Kinloch, P., Metge, J. (2014).Talking past each other: problems of cross cultural communication. Victoria University Press. Law, R., Buhalis, D., Cobanoglu, C. (2014). Progress on information and communication technologies in hospitality and tourism.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,26(5), 727-750. Leung, K., Ang, S., Tan, M. L. (2014). Intercultural competence.Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav.,1(1), 489-519. Merkin, R., Taras, V., Steel, P. (2014). State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: A systematic and meta-analytic review.International Journal of Intercultural Relations,38, 1-23. Padhi, K. P. (2016). The Rising Importance of Cross Cultural Communication in Global Business Scenario. Quest Journals, Volume 4 ~ Issue 1 (2016) pp: 20-26 Prasad, R. (2015). Cross-cultural communication.Educating Young Children: Learning and Teaching in the Early Childhood Years,21(3), 21. Richter, A., Stocker, A., Mller, S., Avram, G. (2013). Knowledge management goals revisited: A cross-sectional analysis of social software adoption in corporate environments.Vine,43(2), 132-148. Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., McDaniel, E. R., Roy, C. S. (2014).Intercultural communication: A reader. Cengage Learning. Shebzukhova, T. A., Bondarenko, N. G. (2014). Language and values as basic elements of cross-cultural communication in tourism. InHumanities and Social Sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives, 3rd International symposium(pp. 310-314). Stahl, G. K., Tung, R. L. (2015). Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in international business studies: The need for positive cross-cultural scholarship.Journal of International Business Studies,46(4), 391-414. Young, T. J., Schartner, A. (2014). The effects of cross-cultural communication education on international students' adjustment and adaptation.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,35(6), 547-562. Zhu, Y., Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2013). Balancing emic and etic: Situated learning and ethnography of communication in cross-cultural management education.Academy of Management Learning Education,12(3), 380-395.